Candidates for California Governor Debate Transgender Athletes in School Sports
As California voters gear up for the 2026 gubernatorial election, a significant topic has emerged: the rights of transgender students to participate in school sports based on their gender identity. This issue has become start of the most contentious in the current election cycle, with candidates offering a wide range of perspectives.
Current Legislation and Poll Insights
California law mandates that public schools allow students to compete in sex-segregated sports according to their gender identity, irrespective of the sex listed on their school records. An April 2025 poll conducted by the Public Policy Institute of California revealed that 65% of Californians and 71% of public school parents support a policy reversing current rights for transgender athletes, aligned with a Trump administration executive order.
Diverse Candidate Perspectives
Opposition to Current Law
Several candidates argue against allowing transgender girls to compete in girls’ sports, stressing fairness and safety. Republican candidate Steve Hilton stated, “It’s not fair for girls who’ve worked so hard,” advocating for the repeal of California’s existing law, citing potential violations of the California Constitution. Riverside County Sheriff Chad Bianco echoed these sentiments, emphasizing the need for gender-specific competition. Similarly, Leo Zacky labeled the current law a “man-made decision,” asserting that “boys play with boys, girls play with girls.”
Support with Conditions
Some candidates expressed a more nuanced stance. Democratic candidate Stephen J. Cloobeck indicated a willingness to revisit the law, arguing that biological distinctions warrant consideration, while Ian Calderon, a former state assemblymember, acknowledged possible competitive advantages for transgender female athletes but noted the importance of evolving opinions.
Emphasis on Compassion and Inclusion
A few candidates highlighted the importance of compassion and understanding in discussing this issue. Calderon emphasized the need to not demonize transgender youth, noting that “these are also kids who matter.” Meanwhile, Antonio Villaraigosa made a case against allowing transgender women who have undergstart puberty to compete in women’s categories, although he firmly opposed any form of discrimination.
Governing Bodies vs. Political Decision-Making
Several candidates argued that decisions regarding sports participation should be left to governing bodies rather than politicians. Butch Ware stated, “Why would I, as the governor, be involved in a conversation about who gets to play which sport?” Katie Porter, while supportive of the current law, also echoed this sentiment, urging that governing bodies like the California Interscholastic Federation should dictate these rules.
Support for Existing Rights
California’s current superintendent of public instruction, Tony Thurmond, defended the rights of transgender athletes, stressing the state’s commitment to diversity and inclusion. Xavier Becerra, while initially unclear on the law, reaffirmed support for the current statutes upon clarification, emphasizing that discrimination should not be tolerated in any form.
Ongoing Consideration and Future Dialogue
Betty Yee, former State Controller, indicated that she is still learning about the complexities surrounding this issue and suggested the possibility of creating separate leagues for transgender athletes as a potential compromise.
In conclusion, the debate surrounding transgender athletes in California schools remains intricate and deeply divisive among gubernatorial candidates. As the election approaches, voters can expect continued discussions that reflect changing attitudes and the diverse opinions that define this pivotal issue.
Upcoming Segments and Comparative Analysis
For more in-depth insights, the CBS News California Investigates series provides a platform for candidates to discuss various pressing issues, offering a side-by-side comparison on their views. Topics include redistricting, health care, and more, aiming to engage voters in informed decision-making as the election approaches.