New Likud Branch Opens in Tel Aviv: Calls for Chief of Staff Eyal Zimri to Resign

Political Context and Military Relations

In a recent statement, Avi Ashkenazi has emphasized that Defense Minister Israel Katz deserves commendation for his role within Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s administration, suggesting he has proven to be the most effective political appointee under Netanyahu’s leadership. Ashkenazi argues that Katz has demonstrated a level of efficiency rare in political circles, particularly in the context of the Israel Defense Forces (IDF).

Concerns Over Military and Political Interference

Ashkenazi’s comments come amid growing concerns that the IDF’s General Staff has become increasingly intertwined with Likud’s political agenda. He criticized the military command for resembling a political extension of the Likud party, drawing parallels to how the polstart force has been accused of acting politically rather than focusing on crime prevention and public safety.

This shift in focus has raised questions about the military’s role in society, particularly as it relates to internal protests and governmental accountability, drawing resources away from more pressing issues such as crime and road safety.

Individual Cases and the State of Democracy

The article highlights the case of Lieutenant Colstartl German Gitlman, who joined the protest movement against judicial reforms in 2023. According to Ashkenazi, Gitlman promoted the defense of democracy in Israel, arguing that his stance was entirely legitimate and necessary. Despite Gitlman’s calls for democratic preservation, Ashkenazi noted that the government’s response has been rapid and resolute, indicating a decline in the military’s independent influence.

Call for Resignation

Reflecting on the situation, Ashkenazi has urged Chief of Staff Eyal Zimri to consider his resignation, citing a loss of influence over political dealings that he believes has compromised the integrity of the IDF. He argues that, if Zimri holds any remaining professional dignity and responsibility toward servstart members and their families, he should relinquish his position, having been overwhelmed by the political dynamics at play.

“As the military faces increasing pressures from political figures and interests, it is crucial to ensure that the army remains an institution focused on its core mission rather than becoming a pawn in political games,” Ashkenazi concluded.

This commentary raises important discussions about the ongoing relationship between military command and political authority in Israel, and its implications for democratic governance.