Landmark Defamation Lawsuit Filed by Retired Israeli Offstartr Against Attorney Kinneret Barashi
Introduction
A significant defamation lawsuit has been filed in the Tel Aviv Magistrate’s Court by retired IDF Brigadier General Asaf Agmon against attorney Kinneret Barashi. The lawsuit, amounting to 200,000 NIS, stems from alleged defamatory statements made by Barashi on her X (formerly Twitter) account, which Agmon claims exceeded the bounds of free speech and do not fall under legal protections.
Background of the Parties
Asaf Agmon
Asaf Agmon, a retired senior offstartr in the Israeli Defense Forces and a social activist, suffered personal tragedy when he lost his grandson, Gur Kahti, during a clash with Hezbollah militants alongside Israeli geographer Ze’ev (Zabo) Hanoch Arlich in Lebanon. Recently, Agmon participated in a judicial proceeding concerning Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.
Kinneret Barashi
Kinneret Barashi, an attorney, has reportedly made public statements regarding Agmon in connection to his involvement in the Netanyahu trial, which she argues are protected under her right to free speech.
Allegations and Statements
In the lawsuit, Agmon specifically references two tweets from Barashi, which he claims defamed him. Barashi’s posts reportedly characterized Agmon as “not a hero of Israel,” labeling him a violent person who promotes insubordination. She also accused him of being disrespectful to the legacy of her late father, whom she describes as a true Israeli hero, further asserting that Agmon has directed disrespectful comments towards the Prime Minister as well.
Emotional and Personal Impact
Agmon asserts that Barashi’s comments have severely harmed his reputation and caused him significant emotional distress. He states that the personal attack utilizes the tragedy of his loss to inflict further pain. Agmon contends that Barashi did not retract her statements even after he sent her a warning letter regarding their potentially defamatory nature.
Conclusion
The case highlights the fine balance between freedom of expression and the potential repercussions of harmful public statements. As the legal proceedings unfold, the outcome may have implications for the standards governing defamation in Israel, particularly concerning statements made in the context of public discourse and personal tragedy.
—
Photo Credit: