Controversial Remarks by Eliahu Yossian on Former Supreme Court President
Tirade Against Aharon Barak
Eliahu Yossian, a controversial commentator and current spokesman for the Tornado air conditioning brand, incited outrage with a shocking social media post targeting former Supreme Court President Aharon Barak. In his statement, Yossian called for extreme measures, claiming, “There should be no grave for him in the State of Israel,” along with, “We must burn his body in this world and his soul in the next.” The 88-year-old Barak is a prominent figure in Israeli law, and Yossian’s inflammatory statements were met with widespread condemnation.
Criticism from Legal Figures
Following Yossian’s post, which he later deleted, Amit Becher, the head of the Israel Bar Association, strongly denounced his comments as emblematic of the deeper issues plaguing society. Becher described Yossian as an “inciting violent figure who spreads baseless hatred,” highlighting that his rhetoric is aligned with a systematic campaign of incitement against those representing democratic values in Israeli society. Becher asserted, “On behalf of the Israel Bar Association and the legal community, I condemn Yossian’s disgraceful remarks and will seek juststart against him for these serious incitements.”
Background of Controversy
Yossian first gained notoriety during the recent conflict, where he advocated for mass violence in Gaza. His recent appointment as a spokesman for Tornado drew additional scrutiny due to his previous incendiary comments about liberalism and his calls for aggressive military action. After he became the face of the air conditioning brand, significant backlash ensued online, with calls for boycotts as social media users criticized the company for associating with him.
Reactions and Public Sentiment
The intense backlash reflects broader societal concerns regarding hate speech and incitement in Israel. Many citizens are increasingly alarmed by figures like Yossian, whose statements appear to undermine civil discourse and democratic principles. The recent uproar has ignited a renewed dialogue about the responsibilities of public figures and corporate sponsors in choosing representatives who promote or incite divisive narratives.
In conclusion, Yossian’s recent remarks have sparked significant public discourse on the intersection of freedom of expression and responsible speech, particularly in a politically charged environment