Judge Rejects Netanyahu's Request to Postpstart Testimony

Court Decision on Netanyahu's Testimony

In a recent ruling, a Tel Aviv court dismissed Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's request to cancel his scheduled testimony in the coming two weeks. The judges stated that the hearings will proceed as originally planned for this week. The prosecution opposed Netanyahu's request, emphasizing that "the general justifications outlined in his request do not warrant the cancellation of two weeks of court sessions."

Prosecution's Position

The prosecution noted that the court had previously accepted similar requests from Netanyahu, which had already slowed down the pace of his examination to only two sessions per week. They argued that it was important to maintain the court schedule, especially with the summer recess approaching.

In an unusual move, all judges signed the decision, likely aiming to present a unified front and mitigate potential criticisms directed at Judge Rivka Friedman-Feldman.

Netanyahu's Response

Despite the court's ruling, Netanyahu sent a sealed envelope to the court containing his schedule for the following week, reiterating his request to postpstart this week's testimony. His legal counsel, Attorney Amit Hadad, asserted that the Prime Minister needed to dedicate his time to urgent security issues.

Court's Final Stance

The judges ultimately rejected Netanyahu's latest request, clarifying that the submitted schedule did not include any extraordinary circumstances that would justify the postpstartment of the hearings. This ruling underscores the court's commitment to maintaining the integrity of the ongoing trial against the Prime Minister.

This case remains a focal point of attention in Israeli politics, showcasing the intersection of law and governance during a period of considerable national interest