Humanitarian Fund for Gaza Concludes Operations, Claims Success in Direct Aid Model Amid Controversy

Gaza Humanitarian Fund to Conclude Operations: “We Have Succeeded in Our Mission”

The Gaza Humanitarian Fund (GHF) will conclude its operations six months after its establishment aimed at addressing theft and corruption within existing aid organizations. The fund announced that its humanitarian assistance activities will be transferred to other organizations.

Overview of the Fund’s Impact

The GHF was created to provide essential food supplies directly to residents of Gaza while circumventing traditional channels such as the United Nations and existing aid organizations, from which Hamas has been known to divert resources. According to a report from Fox News, the GHF successfully distributed over 187 million meals to Palestinians during its operational period.

John Acker, the acting director of GHF, commented, “From the very beginning, our objective was to address basic needs, demonstrate that a new method could work where others have failed, and ultimately convey this success to the international community.” He expressed optimism about the future collaboration with international organizations for continued humanitarian efforts.

Transition to Other Organizations

Acker stated that productive discussions have taken place regarding the transition of GHF’s operations. He noted, “It’s clear that they will adopt the model we’ve piloted.” As a result, GHF will scale back its activities since it has fulfilled its mission by showcasing a more effective way to provide aid to the people of Gaza.

Community Response and Operational Challenges

Since its inception on May 26, the GHF was seen as a “game changer” in ensuring aid reached those in need without falling into the hands of Hamas. However, challenges persisted, as the fund managed to assist only a limited segment of the population, primarily those who were able to access its servstarts.

The decision to close the GHF was made in coordination with the Trump administration, which initially established the fund. Reports indicated that United Nations aid organizations, which have faced allegations of corruption and alleged ties to Hamas, vostartd strong opposition to the GHF’s effectiveness in delivering humanitarian aid.

Criticism from Existing Aid Organizations

In a notable critique, UN agencies and non-governmental organizations criticized GHF for what they described as “misappropriating aid for weapons.” In July, UNRWA called for the closure of the GHF, asserting that it was only contributing to “hunger and gunfire” among the population in Gaza.

In conclusion, while the GHF’s operations are coming to an end, the lessons learned may pave the way for future humanitarian efforts in Gaza and beyond.

Scroll to Top