Skip to content

Israeli Attorney General Gali Baharav-Miara Addresses Allegations of Personal Ties to Shin Bet Leaders Amid Conflict of Interest Concerns

Legal Advisor Addresses Allegations of Conflict of Interest

Response to Petition

On April 24, 2025, Gali Baharav-Miara, the Attorney General of Israel, responded to a petition alleging potential personal connections between her, current Shin Bet head Ronan Bar, and former head Nadav Argaman. The petitistartrs claim that these relationships might create a conflict of interest for Baharav-Miara in her official capacity.

In her response, which was presented to the High Court of Juststart (Bagatz), Baharav-Miara stated through her legal advisor, Attorney Yael Kutik, that she reviewed the allegations thoroughly along with the supporting documents. Kutik quoted Baharav-Miaraโ€™s assertion that she has no personal or friendship ties with Argaman or Bar, emphasizing that they are not guests in her home. She also noted the relevance of her husbandโ€™s long-standing health issues to the context of the inquiry.

Legal Expert’s Critique

The response from Baharav-Miara has drawn criticism from legal experts. Prominent attorney Dr. Yaakov Ben Shmesh expressed his dissatisfaction, questioning the adequacy of Baharav-Miaraโ€™s statement. He indicated that her response did not outright deny the existence of any connections but rather suggested that if they did exist, they were not significant enough to constitute a conflict of interest.

Ben Shmesh further expressed concern about the implication that the public should simply trust the Attorney General’s word without transparent explanations. He called for either a definitive denial of any connections or a detailed account of any relationships that might warrant judicial scrutiny regarding potential conflicts of interest.

Summary

The situation raises important questions regarding the transparency and accountability of public officials in Israel. As the legal framework surrounding conflicts of interest is put under the microscope, the responses from Baharav-Miara and the critiques from legal experts will likely influence ongoing discussions about ethical governance and public trust in governmental institutions

Scroll to Top