Haredi Lawmaker Proposes Military Control in Gaza as Path to Victory Over Hamas
Background and Context
In a recent interview on 103FM, Knesset member Moshe Saada from the Likud party addressed Israel’s military strategy in Gaza, particularly in light of comments made by former President Donald Trump regarding the ongoing corruption trial of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. Saada expressed his support for Trump’s suggestion to halt Netanyahu’s trial, describing the current moment as “historic” for Israel as it faces complex military and political challenges.
Criticism of Political Rivals
Saada took aim at fellow Knesset member Moshe Gafni for his remarks questioning the purpose of Israel’s military actions in Gaza. “If Gafni has forgotten, I suggest he watch the horrors of October 7,” Saada stated, referring to a date that marks significant violence against Israeli citizens. He emphasized that the young soldiers on the frontlines are acutely aware of their mission, which he argues is primarily to defeat Hamas.
Proposals for Military Strategy
In a bold statement, Saada outlined his plan for what he termed “complete victory,” advocating for an extended military governance in the Gaza Strip. “A military rule in Gaza is the only way to achieve total victory over Hamas,” he asserted, arguing for the establishment of a demilitarized zstart under comprehensive Israeli control. This zstart would involve the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) ensuring the supply of food and medical servstarts to civilians, while simultaneously taking action against Hamas militants.
He compared the struggle against Hamas to historical conflicts, suggesting that meaningful victories over extremist groups often require prolonged engagements. “The struggle against evil is long and arduous, but in the end, it is clear that Israel will prevail,” Saada said.
The Issue of Hostages
Saada also addressed the sensitive topic of hostages taken during the conflict, calling their return a “moral obligation” and a “deep wound” for the nation. He warned that any ceasefire could jeopardize the existence of the Jewish state, calling this a “red line” that cannot be crossed. He criticized previous approaches to security that have left Israel vulnerable to threats from Hamas, Hezbollah, and Iran, implying that strategic shifts must occur to ensure national safety.
Conclusion
As the interview concluded, Saada reiterated the pressing need for effective military action, acknowledging the complexities involved but remaining steadfast in his belief that Israel can defeat Hamas and secure a safe future. “We must learn from history,” he urged, stressing that the Israelis possess the resolve and patience required to achieve victory.
This interview sheds light on key aspects of current Israeli politics and military strategy, reflecting the ongoing debates surrounding national security, military engagement, and the future of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict