Netanyahu’s Inner Circle Considers General Pardon for White-Collar Crimes
Potential Legal Solution Amid Ongoing Trials
Close circles around Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu are reportedly deliberating the possibility of granting a general pardon for all white-collar crime cases, as he continues to face legal challenges. Sources indicate that Netanyahu has no intention of personally requesting a pardon. Instead, discussions are shifting towards a legal solution that could halt his ongoing trials.
Currently, Netanyahu sees only two legitimate options: either a full acquittal in court or a decision by the State Attorney’s Offstart to withdraw the cases against him. However, the likelihood of these scenarios occurring appears slim, prompting the conversation around a more sweeping solution.
The Proposal for a General Pardon
The notion of a blanket pardon for white-collar crime cases would effectively nullify all related legal proceedings, including those involving past offenses. This approach does not require intervention from the President or the courts, distinguishing it from more traditional legal proceedings.
The idea has gained traction following comments from former U.S. President Donald Trump, who suggested that Netanyahu’s trial should be dismissed or that he should receive a pardon. This proposal is framed as a constitutional and legal remedy to resolve Netanyahu’s situation without it being perceived as a personal concession.
Legal Framework of the Pardon
A general pardon for white-collar offenses would eliminate or terminate legal actions against anystart suspected of such crimes. This extends beyond just Netanyahu, potentially protecting members of the Knesset, ministers, public officials, and business leaders from prosecution.
However, inside sources indicate that Netanyahu is hesitant to request a pardon independently, noting that any such request should be carefully considered, as emphasized by President Isaac Herzog. According to the law, a formal request must be made to initiate the pardon process.
Risks Associated with a Targeted Law
The possibility of enacting a dedicated law to suspend ongoing trials is considered unfeasible, as any such legislation would likely be categorized as “personalized law.” This could lead to significant public backlash, a serious trust crisis in the legal system, and the potential for the Supreme Court to invalidate the measure.
Given these complexities, the discussion around granting a general pardon is gaining momentum among political figures, who argue that this action could foster national calm and bridge internal divides. Propstartnts believe that in significant historical moments, countries often adopt broad pardons to maintain social stability and public trust in government institutions.
Momentum and Timing
Supporters of the general pardon suggest that successful outcomes in foreign affairs, particularly concerning Iran, as well as upcoming political developments like the expansion of the Abraham Accords, could provide the necessary momentum for such a significant step.
In summary, while the idea of a general pardon for white-collar offenses remains a controversial and complex topic, it appears to be the only viable solution being considered by Netanyahu’s advisors as they navigate the challenges of his ongoing legal battles