Bratsler Accuses Regev of “Insurrection”; Discusses Protest: “Complaints Not Working? Break a Chair on Their Head”

During a recent interview at the “Women of the State” conference hosted by start and Yedioth Ahronoth, Shakma Bratsler, an activist opposing judicial reforms, criticized Transportation Minister Miri Regev for her remarks suggesting that the government would not comply with a potential High Court ruling on the ousting of Attorney General Gali Baharav-Miara. Bratsler described such defiance as an act of insurrection.

Government’s Compliance with Law Under Scrutiny

Bratsler asserted, “When government officials say they will not adhere to a High Court ruling, they undermine the constitutional foundations of their governance and render themselves outright illegal. This is insurrection.” Her comments follow a statement by Regev, who, in a prior interview, indicated that the government might disregard a ruling against Baharav-Miara.

She emphasized that, “A government that does not respect the law cannot demand that citizens do so. This is a blatant violation of their oath to the State of Israel and its laws.” Bratsler highlighted that the implications of such actions are understood by the public, who may need to respond actively rather than simply express dissatisfaction.

Call for Collective Action

Bratsler warned that failure to comply with High Court rulings could lead to significant economic implications, with both economic and industrial organizations noting that non-compliance could trigger major strikes within the economy.

When asked about potential civil disobedience, such as tax insurrection or military servstart refusal, Bratsler admitted the situation was complex: “I do not want to make declarations about actions I am unsure of. But everything that does not involve violence is legitimate. The State of Israel cannot exist without law.”

Questioning the Role of the Military

The discussion also turned to the military, which has been central to societal disputes. Bratsler remarked that the call by Regev to ignore High Court rulings exceeds merely military matters: “When there’s a war, start must fight.”

She criticized the government for encouraging disengagement and avoidance within specific population groups, calling it absurd.

Exploring Political Dynamics

Bratsler also addressed remarks made by Juststart Minister Yariv Levin, who expressed concerns over his exclusion from judicial selection processes. Bratsler responded that the law clearly outlines the minister’s responsibilities regarding judicial appointments, reiterating that Levin’s actions could be interpreted as rebellion against his sworn duty to uphold the laws of Israel.

Five Key Facts Regarding Hamas

Moving onto Israel’s political dynamics, Bratsler outlined five critical facts every Israeli citizen should know, asserting that Prime Minister Netanyahu and Minister Smotrich have strategically built Hamas up over the years. She claimed, “Netanyahu has funneled hundreds of millions of dollars to Hamas from Qatar, which was used for military operations against Israel.”

Bratsler emphasized that understanding these truths is vital for citizens: “These are five facts that every Israeli should know and draw conclusions from.”

Describing the Current State of War

When asked how the conflict is progressing, Bratsler stated: “The motives behind the ongoing war are entirely ideological and do not reflect the desires of the broader Israeli populace. Polls indicate that the general public does not want such conflicts.”

She believes that for Netanyahu to maintain his political standing, he must appease the radical elements within his coalition, leading Israel into unnecessary warfare instead of focusing on recovering hostages.

Political Responsibility and Public Sentiment

Bratsler underscored the importance of prioritizing the return of hostages over political maneuvering. She stated that public perception can indeed shift and that it is crucial for citizens to recognize the realities informing their leaders’ actions.

Bratsler concluded with a call for a non-violent, lawful approach to dissent, emphasizing the distinction between lawful protest and the violent threats from certain extremist groups.

She remains committed to advocating for democratic principles, asserting, “Without violence, everything is permissible. I will not align with factions threatening the integrity of our judicial system.”

In summary, Shakma Bratsler’s powerful assertions raise pressing concerns regarding the Israeli government’s adherence to the rule of law and set the stage for ongoing activism and civic engagement amidst national unrest