Systemic Failure or Longcover-Up? Resolution of the Ambassador’s Apartment Saga Linked to Netanyahu
Background of the Apartment Issue
The Israeli Foreign Ministry announced last week that the ownership of the Israeli ambassador’s apartment at the United Nations in New York has been officially transferred and is no longer registered under the name of former Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. This long-standing issue, which has raised public criticism for decades, has finally been resolved, with the property now registered in the name of the Israeli Permanent Mission to the UN, as it should have been years ago.
Historical Context
The apartment, intended for the residence of Israel’s ambassador to the U.N., was purchased by the State of Israel. Despite Netanyahu concluding his term in this role in 1988, the property remained registered in his name for many years, prompting significant scrutiny and concern about the management of Israeli assets abroad.
Advocacy for Resolution
The movement to rectify this issue was spearheaded by the Israel Movement for Quality Government, which repeatedly urged the Foreign Ministry to clarify the ownership status of the apartment and transfer the title back to the state. Following a lack of response to several Freedom of Information requests, the organization filed a petition with the Jerusalem District Court earlier this month.
In a response to the legal actions taken, the Foreign Ministry announced the transfer of ownership, marking the end of a lengthy saga that raised serious questions about the transparency and management of the state’s overseas assets.
Statements from Advocates
Attorney Tamar Baum, head of the municipal department at the Israel Movement for Quality Government, expressed satisfaction with the outcome: “The transfer of ownership of the ambassador’s apartment in New York serves as a welcome conclusion to a prolonged saga, in which a state-owned asset was inexplicably registered under a private individual’s name.”
She added, “The State of Israel has been sluggish in managing its assets, which is perplexing. It is unacceptable for state resources to be registered under an individual’s name, regardless of their importance, without appropriate action taken to reclaim them. The Israel Movement for Quality Government will continue to work to ensure that state resources and assets are managed transparently and cleanly to protect the interests of all citizens.”
Conclusion
The resolution of this ownership issue marks a significant step towards ensuring better oversight and accountability over state properties abroad. It remains to be seen how this will influence broader discussions about government asset management and transparency in Israel.
Feel free to book accommodations for your future travels through