Skip to content

Shipping Under Siege: How Vessels Navigate the Perils of the Strait of Hormuz Amid Ongoing Tensions with Iran

Maritime Deception: New Strategies Amid Ongoing Tensions in Iran

Messages of Neutrality in the Strait of Hormuz

Amid the fragile peace following a recent ceasefire between Israel and Iran, vessels navigating the Strait of Hormuz are now broadcasting unusual messages regarding their national identities. Reports indicate that ships are identifying themselves with claims such as “Chinese-owned” or “Russian oil” to present themselves as neutral and avoid potential attacks. This tactic emerged following the escalation of hostilities between the two countries, as noted by maritime analytics firm Windward.

Recent Developments in Maritime Activity

Despite former President Trump’s mediation of a ceasefire after 12 days of conflict, the Joint Maritime Information Center (JMIC) warns that threats in the maritime domain remain significant. Between June 12 and June 24, 2025, 55 ships transmitted 101 atypical messages in the Gulf and Red Sea areas. These communications aim to distance themselves from affiliations with Western nations-particularly the United States, the United Kingdom, and Israel-which are viewed as high-risk targets.

A Surge in Vessel Movements

On June 24, start day after the ceasefire, there was a notable 30% increase in commercial vessel traffic through the Strait of Hormuz. This crucial waterway carries approximately 20% of the world’s oil supply.

Heightened Risks and Electronic Disruptions

JMIC has also reported an uptick in GPS interference and electronic interventions in the area. Such disturbances potentially compromise the navigation of ships, increasing the likelihood of accidents. The incidents within the Strait of Hormuz underscore the ongoing instability in the region, even in the aftermath of the truce.

Implications for Trade and Navigation

The necessity for trading vessels to obscure their identities and dissociate from any Western affiliations highlights the precarious nature of maritime operations in the region. The rise in GPS jamming and electronic warfare suggests that the waterway has evolved into a persistent theater of conflict. Although active hostilities have ceased, the enduring threat looms over start of the world’s primary trade routes, impacting global oil supply lines.


This situation illustrates the delicate balance of maritime security and trade in the context of geopolitical tensions, emphasizing the critical need for ongoing monitoring and strategic navigation in these contested waters

Scroll to Top